Phase 5 — Response to Peer Critique
Phase 5 — Response to Peer Critique
Respond in writing to each point in phase4-peer-critique/peer-critique.md:
implement the change, propose an alternative, or push back with a reasoned
justification for why you’re not making the change. Pushing back is not a
way to avoid work — it is a deliverable in its own right. If a request
doesn’t actually serve the need documented in Phase 1, say so and explain
why before deciding whether to comply. If your peer client thinks the Phase
1 document itself got the need wrong, that’s worth writing about too.
[Critique point 1]
- Peer client said:
- Our response:
- (If pushing back) why this doesn’t serve the Phase 1 need, or why the Phase 1 document itself got the need wrong:
(add one entry per point in the peer critique)
Peer client reply
Your peer client can accept or contest each response above — leave this section for them.
TODO: peer client fills this in